commentary
2008-06-16

MY REPLY

It is not as if those of us who argue against government mismanagement, lack of forward planning and lack of transparency about the disbursements of Petronas profits from higher oil prices are any less sober than those who argue against fuel subsidies per se. Nor are we necessarily against properly managed withdrawal or reduction of fuel subsidies if there is a corresponding reinvestment into such infrastructure enhancement as public transportation. All this is in fact represented in my article. Reread it.

Not for a moment are we objecting to alternative ways of helping consumers in the longer term or wiser use of public funds. But no matter how reasonable these arguments may be, the question remains: these things have not been done over all these years by the powers that be and so it will take quite a leap of faith to believe that with this latest huge price hike in fuel they are going to do the right thing. The track record up to now does not inspire optimism on my part.

Even the newspapers headlines which says, “Cost cutting to save RM2 billion” provokes anger as the report reveals that all this while ministers and deputy ministers were entitled to paid holidays outside Malaysia and Asean. Just think! Over all these years with such a big cabinet, how much money has already left the nation’s coffers.

Yes, I argue for poorer people who will be the hardest hit by these huge hike in fuel prices. And I say here that none of the measures being proposed will be effective to help them in the immediate or even short term. On target though they may be, what are being proposed as better remedies than fuel subsidies are almost all long-term measures (even if we suspend our doubts about the government’s resolve to help the masses).

Perhaps if more Malaysians will be allowed to show their displeasure and disbelief that this latest round will result in any better use of public funds, the government will take stock that this time round, the rakyat will not let them off so easily.

Viewed from this perspective, I welcome views and recommendations about how best to spend public funds for optimum development and benefit for Malaysians.

But for now, I reiterate that poorer Malaysians need effective help to survive the here and now.

“My whole being will exclaim, “Who is like you, O LORD ? You rescue the poor from those too strong for them, the poor and needy from those who rob them.”

Psalm 35:9-11, The Holy Bible

Comments

Comments are subject to moderation.

1 total posts | view profile

3. Ben (06/22/2008 09:14:58)  
We are the salt and light of this world

I am just hopeful that God in His mercy and grace will not prolong the suffering the poor had to endure in under this callous government. We cannot stand by and look as if this will not affect us and especially since we are called to be the head and not the tail.

Even if we cannot champion the cause, we need to show a strong support for the alleviation of the suffering inflicted by the government mistakes. We need to show we care. How do we do that?

8 total posts | view profile

2. Allen Tan (06/19/2008 09:06:15)  
Nothing hidden shall not be exposed

God in these last days has exposed the foul deeds of BN. No one including the opposition persons, knew about the huge five figure monthly entertainment allowances for ministers and deputies. RM18,00 is a lot of money. The govt should not slash 10% but abolish the whole system.

2 total posts | view profile

1. Alwyn (06/16/2008 18:28:48)  
Negative income tax?

Thanks, Mr Goh, for this sober assessment. What about the following idea from blogger John Lee?

"
If we really want to aid the common man, then just rebate the petroleum revenue to him, as the DAP has proposed. The most efficient welfare system is one which gives money to people to spend as they find necessary. When you give me a lump sum payment, under, say, a negative income tax policy, I can spend it not just on petrol, but on public transport, school uniforms, food, whatever. If I don't have a car, I still benefit. Relative to a subsidy on petrol alone, a direct transfer payment is more efficient."

http://www.infernalramblings.com/articles/Malaysian_Economy/746/#forum_comments